
How Do You Rate This Publication?
![]()
| Title: | Chemical and physical interpretation of MDI cure in saturated steam environments |
|---|---|
| Author(s): | Harper, David; Wolcott, Michael P.; Rials, Timothy |
| Date: | 1999 |
| Source: | Proceedings of the second European panel products Symposium; 1998 October 21-22; Llandudno, Wales, UK.Gwynedd, Wales, UK: 193-204. |
| Station ID: | -- |
| Description: | The cure of polymeric 4-4? diphenylmethane diisocyanate, PMDl, in wood composite manufacturing has been the subject of much research. The exact contribution of polyurethane, polyurea, and polyurete formation to PMDI/wood bonding is still debated. This study foregoes the mechanism controversy and studies the cure from a panel consolidation process. Micro-dielectric analysis, mDEA, was utilized to monitor the cure of PMDI in a controlled environment of heat, steam, and pressure simulating those encountered during wood composite manufacturing. A small steam-generating chamber was mounted to a universal testing machine that produced saturated steam environments between 110° and 140°C. The degree of conversion calculated from mDEA provided a basis for further spectroscopic, calorimetric, and lap-shear analysis. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) revealed a large consumption of isocyanate early in cure. However, lap-shear analysis showed that mechanical strength did not develop until late in cure. Low ultimate lap-shear strengths and a plateau in conversion rates were detected for bondlines cured at 110° and 120°C. These characteristics may indicate a transition to diffusion-controlled reaction resulting from a vitrification effect such as crystallization. A phenomenological approach to composite cure kinetics was applied to model isothermal mDEA and dynamic DSC data. Models successfully predicted cure that followed analytical results. Higher activation energies were obtained for mDEA than were generated from DSC methods. The observed differences in activation energy are interpreted in terms of differing mechanisms in the progression of chemical and physical cure. |
View and Print this Publication (204 KB) ![]() |
|
| Pristine Version: | An uncaptured or "pristine" version of this publication is available. It has not been subjected to OCR (Optical Character Recognition) and therefore does not have any errors in the text. However it is a larger file size and some people may experience long download times. The "pristine" version of this publication is available here: View and Print the PRISTINE copy of this Publication (4.0 MB) | Publication Notes: |
We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain. Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS Webmaster, srswebmaster@fs.fed.us if you notice any errors which make this publication unuseable. You may send email to pubrequest@fs.fed.us to request a hard copy of this publication. (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.) |
| Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility |