Note: This article is part of a larger document. View the larger document

How Do You Rate This Publication?
![]()
| Title: | Hardwood Chip Export Mills in Arkansas - Implications for Sustainability |
|---|---|
| Author(s): | Gray, John L.; Guldin, James M. |
| Date: | 2001 |
| Source: | Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS 41. Asheville, NC: U.S.Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. pp. 113-123 |
| Description: | Abstract - Two new hardwood chip export mills (HCEMs) recently began operating in west-central Arkansas,and a third is planned. Together,they will require 1.1 million tons of nonhickory hardwood roundwood annually, primarily from the nonindustrial private sector. Overall, total physical and operable growth surpluses could support the new sector, but purchasable surpluses are barely adequate now and may be less than adequate by 2005. The HCEMs will generate about 630 direct and indirect jobs and $16.75 million in yearly wages and stumpage payments. However,if all of the new demand is met by unsightly harvesting methods, tourism-related job losses after 15 years could offset HCEM-generated employment. Because HCEMs will increase competition for hardwood, some small sawmills may go out of business, although the turnover of small sawmills was high even before HCEMs entered the market.The HCEM market for small hardwoods is less than ideal, but these mills can process "rough" and "rotten" trees. HCEM harvesting is generally not good forestry; to date, it has tended to take the best trees and leave the worst.This could improve if landowners were better informed and willing to reinvest following harvest. The effects of HCEMs on Arkansas hardwood forests as a whole are not expected to be great. Although protection of soils and water quality has been inconsistent, the new sector appears to be committed to provide such protection on lands they harvest. The authors present six recommendations designed to promote a positive effect of new sector operations on the sustainability of timber resources and other forest values. |
View and Print this Publication (972 KB) ![]() |
Publication Notes: |
We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain. Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS Webmaster, srswebmaster@fs.fed.us if you notice any errors which make this publication unuseable. |
| Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility |