Browse Units


Contact Information

Southern
Research Station

200 W.T. Weaver Blvd.
Asheville, NC
28804-3454
(828) 257-4832
(828) 259-0503 TTY

Publication Information

 Evaluate this publication
How Do You Rate This Publication?
  Bookmark and Share       Mail this page

Title: Impacts of fire and fire surrogate treatments on ecosystem nitrogen storage patterns: similarities and differences between forests of eastern and western North America
Author(s): Boerner, R.E.J.; Huang, J.; Hart, S.C.
Date: 2009
Source: Canadian Journal of Forest Research 38: 3056-3070.
Description: The Fire and Fire Surrogates (FFS) network is composed of 12 forest sites that span the continental United
States, all of which historically had frequent low-severity fire. The goal of the FFS study was to assess the efficacy of
three management treatments (prescribed fire, mechanical thinning, and their combination) in reducing wildfire hazard and
increasing ecosystem sustainability. This paper describes the impact of the FFS treatments on nitrogen (N) storage and distribution.
At the network scale, total ecosystem N averaged 4480 kgha–1, with *9% in vegetation, *9% in forest floor,
*2% in deadwood, and *80% in soil. The loss of vegetation N to fire averaged (±SE) 25 ± 11 kgha–1, whereas the mechanical
and combined mechanical and fire treatments resulted in N losses of 133 ± 21 and 145 ± 19 kgha–1, respectively.
Western coniferous forests lost more N from each treatment than did eastern forests. None of the manipulative FFS treatments
impacted >10%–15% of total N of these ecosystems. Management strategies that maximize ecosystem carbon (C)
gain by minimizing loss of N should be a focus in western forests, where C and N cycling are tightly linked, but perhaps
not in those eastern forests where atmospheric N deposition has decoupled C and N cycles.
View and Print this Publication (764.38 KB)     Evaluate this publication
Publication Notes: We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain. Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS Webmaster, srswebmaster@fs.fed.us if you notice any errors which make this publication unuseable.
 [ Get Acrobat ] Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility