
How Do You Rate This Publication?
![]()
| Title: | Strips, Clearcuts, And Deferment Cuts: Harvest Costs And Site Impacts For Alternative Prescriptions In Upland Hardwoods |
|---|---|
| Author(s): | Rummer, Robert B.; Carter, Emily; Stokes, Bryce; Klepac, John |
| Date: | 1997 |
| Source: | Hardwood Symposium, May 7-10, 1997 |
| Description: | Clearcutting upland hardwood stands is a common management prescription in the South which maximizes harvest efficiency. However, with increasing concerns about esthetics and ecological impacts, a better understanding of alternative treatments is needed. This study compared conventional block clearcutting, strip clearcutting, and deferment cutting in replicated treatments in northern Alabama. Treatment did not have a significant effect on felling productivity or costs, but did affect skidding productivity. The primary factor affecting harvesting productivity was average tree size of removals. Clearcutting caused significantly greater increases in soil bulk density than deferment or strip cutting. However, clearcutsoil disturbance was the same as for deferment cutting. |
View and Print this Publication (213 KB) ![]() |
Publication Notes: |
We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain. Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS Webmaster, srswebmaster@fs.fed.us if you notice any errors which make this publication unuseable. |
| Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility |