Browse Units


Contact Information

Southern
Research Station

200 W.T. Weaver Blvd.
Asheville, NC
28804-3454
(828) 257-4832
(828) 259-0503 TTY

Publication Information

 Evaluate this publication
How Do You Rate This Publication?
  Bookmark and Share       Mail this page

Title: Use of ELISA Immunoassay Kits as a Complement to HPLC Analysis of lmazapyr and Triclopyr in Water Samples from Forest Watersheds
Author(s): Fischer, J.B.; Michael, J.L.
Date: 1997
Source: Bull. Environ. Contam.Toxicol. (1997) 59:61l-618
Description: The herbicide triclopyr (3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinyl)-oxyacetic acid has been marketed by the Dow Chemical Co. since the mid 1970's as the triethylammonium salt (Garlon 3A) and as the ethylene glycol butyl ether ester (Garlon 4). Shortly after its introduction, McKellar (1977) published a method for the extraction, isolation, and electron capture gas chroinatographic analysis of triclopyr and two of its major metabolites in soil and water samples. A number of environmental fate studies of triclopyr have been published since then, each of which has used the McKellar method or a minor modification of it (Oloffs et al. 1986; Deubert et al. 1986; Norris et al. 1987; Whisenant et al. 1989). Glas (1978) developed a method along similar lines for the analysis of triclopyr in plant tissues as did Bovey et al. (1983). While state-of-the-art for their day, these methods are labor-intensive and time-consuming. They use large volumes of dichloromethane which has been designated a hazardous material by the EPA, making its disposal difficult and expensive. These methods also involve derivitization with diazomethane, which is an explosion hazard and requires handling of highly carcinogenic precursors. We have developed a rugged high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method for analysis of the free-acid form of triclopyr in environmental water samples. This method features solid-phase extraction (SPE) and a lead diacetate cleanup to remove interfering humic substances. We have applied this method to the analysis of over two thousand water samples from a major environmental fate study we conducted on the Ouachita National Forest, Arkansas, but only 10 samples could be processed in one technician-day. Samples from environmental fate studies collected in one day frequently exceed 200-300 so there is a great need for a method which will accelerate the analysis of these samples.
View and Print this Publication (122 KB)     Evaluate this publication
Publication Notes: We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain. Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS Webmaster, srswebmaster@fs.fed.us if you notice any errors which make this publication unuseable.
 [ Get Acrobat ] Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility