How Do You Rate This Publication?       

Title:	Ensuring Environmentally Sustainable Production of Dedicated Biomass Feedstocks
Author(s):	Tolbert, V.R.; Mays, D.A.; Houston, A.; Tyler, D.D.; Perry, C.H.; Brooks, K.E.; Thornton, F.C.; Bock, B.R.; Joslin, J.D.; Trettin, Carl C.; Isebrands, J.
Date:	2000
Source:	Biocentropy 2000, Moving Technology into the Marketplace, The Ninth Biennial Bioenergy Conference Proceedings, Buffalo, NY, October 15-19, 2000
Description:	Ensuring acceptance of dedicated biomass feedstocks by landowners, agricultural communities, environmental and public interest groups, requires that the environmental benefits, concerns, and risks associated with their production be quantified. Establishment and management measures to benefit soil and water quality are being identified by ongoing research. Field studies are showing that nutrients are retained within the rooting zone of dedicated feedstocks, subsurface herbicide transport does not occur, and off-site chemical transport is minimal compared with traditional agricultural crops. The amounts and timing of fertilizer application were critical to minimizing off-site transport of nutrients. Maintaining soil cover decreased runoff, sediment losses, and nutrient transport compared with traditional agricultural crops. Conversion of traditional croplands to biomass and no-till crop production improved soil quality and soil carbon storage. Subsurface nutrient losses were less from biomass crops than adjacent natural forests or agricultural crops in Minnesota. Data across the spectrum of climates and soils from North to South show initial gains in soil carbon are greater at shallow depths (0- 10 cm) and in lower organic soils. Addressing environmental questions across planting scales and documenting changes in soil and water quality with biomass crop production on former agricultural lands is critical to identifying production options to (1) maximize environmental quality, (2) minimize environmental risks, and (3) ensure economic benefits for growers.
	View and Print this Publication (180 KB)
Pristine Version:	An uncaptured or "pristine" version of this publication is available. It has not been subjected to OCR (Optical Character Recognition) and therefore does not have any errors in the text. However it is a larger file size and some people may experience long download times. The "pristine" version of this publication is available here: View and Print the PRISTINE copy of this Publication (1.1 MB)
Publication Notes:	We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information. This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain. Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS Webmaster, srswebmaster@fs.fed.us if you notice any errors which make this publication unuseable.
	Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility