
How Do You Rate This Publication?
![]()
| Title: | Slash pine rootwood in flakeboard |
|---|---|
| Author(s): | Howard, E.T. |
| Date: | 1974 |
| Source: | Forest Products Journal 24(6):29-35 |
| Description: | Flakes 3 Inches along the grain. 3/8-inch wide, and 0.02 inch thick were machined from the taproots (with 6-inch-high stump) and second logs at eight 31-year-old slash pines. Specific gravity (O.D. weight, green volume) of stems averaged 0.52; rootwood averaged 0.43 and decreased sharply with depth below ground. Forty-four-lb./cu. ft. structural-type particleboards were prepared with random orientation of flakes and 5 percent phenol-formaldehyde solids. Stemwood boards were stiffer (737,000 psi MOE) than rootwood boards (643,000 psi MOE), but bending strength was lower (4,800 psi MOR) for stemboards than for footboards (5,500 psi MOR), MOE/MOR ratio was 155 for stemboards and 118 for rootboards. The two types of boards did not differ in nail-withdrawal resistance (96 and 97 lb.). Internal bond of footboards (114 psi) was almost double that of stemboards (60 psi); the difference was associated in part with the greater densification of rootwood (x 1.66) as compared with stemwood (x 1.36). Root flakes were more conformable but had higher proportions of grain deviation and damaged surfaces. Rootboards had greater dimensional movement in both planes, greater soaked moisture content, greater thickness springback, and greater recovery from linear swell. Interrelations of board properties differed for the two materials. Differences appeared to be primarily due to anatomical characteristics, lower inherent strength of rootwood, degree of densiflcation, and machinability. |
View and Print this Publication (2.3 MB) ![]() |
Publication Notes: |
We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain. Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS Webmaster, srswebmaster@fs.fed.us if you notice any errors which make this publication unuseable. |
| Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility |