
How Do You Rate This Publication?
![]()
| Title: | Combinations of fungicide and cultural practices influence the incidence and impact of fusiform rust in slash pine plantations |
|---|---|
| Author(s): | Haywood, James D.; Tiarks, Allan E. |
| Date: | 1994 |
| Source: | Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, Vol. 18, No. 2 |
| Description: | Slash pine was grown in central Louisiana under four levels of culture with or without repeated sprayings of the systematic fungicide triadimefon for protection against fusiform rust. The eight treatment combinations were: (1)no fungicide, weed control, or fertilizer; (2)weeded; (3)weeded, applied inorganic fertilizer, and bedded before planting; (4)weeded, bedded, and applied inorganic fertilizer in the sixth growing season (delayed fertilization); (5)applied fungicide but no weed control or fertilizer; (6)applied fungicide and weeded; (7)applied fungicide plus treatment 3; and (8)applied fungicide plus treatment 4. Fungicide applications greatly reduced fusiform rust impact in 10-yr-old slash pine stands. Fungicide treatments resulted in higher survival, fewer trees with stem galls, fewer trees with galls encircling 76%-100% of the stem circumference, greater total volume/ac, and less volume/ac among infected trees. The fungicide-treated trees had fewer stem galls below 5ft of tree height compared with untreated trees, indicating that the fungicide treatment protected planted seedlings throught several growing seasons. Weed control increased fusiform rust incidence. The fungicide-treated plots recieving delayed fertilization yeilded the most volume (3018 ft3/ac) after 10 growing seasons because of high stocking and accelerated growth following fertilization. |
View and Print this Publication (525 KB) ![]() |
|
| Pristine Version: | An uncaptured or "pristine" version of this publication is available. It has not been subjected to OCR (Optical Character Recognition) and therefore does not have any errors in the text. However it is a larger file size and some people may experience long download times. The "pristine" version of this publication is available here: View and Print the PRISTINE copy of this Publication (748 KB) | Publication Notes: |
We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain. Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS Webmaster, srswebmaster@fs.fed.us if you notice any errors which make this publication unuseable. |
| Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility |