Short-term effects of fuel reduction treatments on herpetofauna from the southeastern United States

  • Authors: Kilpatrick, Eran S.; Waldrop, Thomas A.; Lanham, Joseph D.; Greenberg, Cathryn H.; Contreras, Tom H.
  • Publication Year: 2010
  • Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
  • Source: Forest Science 56(1):122-130

Abstract

Path analysis of fuel reduction treatments on herpetofauna across four southeastern sites of the National Fire and Fire Surrogate Study provided quantitative evidence relating changes in vegetation and fuels to herpetofauna response. Fuel reduction treatments included prescribed burning (B), a mechanical treatment (M), mechanical treatment followed by prescribed burning (MB), and an untreated control (C). Treatment effects on herpetofauna response variables were predicted by the direct and indirect effects of stand basal area, coarse woody debris volume, native herb cover, and forest floor depth. Path models were solved for lizard, snake, and reptile response to fuel reduction treatments. Lizard and reptile abundance were higher in B and MB plots than in C and M plots. Increasing native herb cover best predicted lizard and reptile abundance within B and MB plots. Native herb cover, lizard, and reptile abundance were highest in B and MB plots, and each of these response variables responded positively to B and MB.

  • Citation: Kilpatrick, Eran S.; Waldrop, Thomas A.; Lanham, Joseph D.; Greenberg, Cathryn H.; Contreras, Tom H. 2010. Short-term effects of fuel reduction treatments on herpetofauna from the southeastern United States. Forest Science 56(1):122-130.
  • Keywords: herpetofauna, path analysis, prescribed burning, Southeastern forests, forest management, mechanical
  • Posted Date: September 8, 2010
  • Modified Date: September 23, 2010
  • Print Publications Are No Longer Available

    In an ongoing effort to be fiscally responsible, the Southern Research Station (SRS) will no longer produce and distribute hard copies of our publications. Many SRS publications are available at cost via the Government Printing Office (GPO). Electronic versions of publications may be downloaded, printed, and distributed.

    Publication Notes

    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
    • Our online publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS webmaster if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • To view this article, download the latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader.